| |
Who has a stake in smart growth?
Promoting the redevelopment of existing cities and towns
rather than more suburban sprawl makes sense for a wide range of people,
including:
- Taxpayers, because efficient use of existing public facilities and
infrastructure holds down tax burdens.
- Children, because traditional neighborhoods are easier to get around
in on foot or by bike.
- Senior citizens, who benefit from greater transit options and more
affordable housing.
- Business leaders, who realize that compact, livable cities with efficient
transportation systems make good business sense.
- Conservationists, who want to protect natural areas and wetlands,
save energy, and prevent air and water pollution.
- Inner-city residents, who need support to redevelop neighborhoods
impacted by years of disinvestment.
- Residents of inner-ring suburbs, whose quality of life is also threatened
by regional patterns of outmigration.
- Farmers, who want to keep farming without the threat of encroaching
subdivisions.
- Developers, who would like to see a consensus on where development
is appropriate.
- Local officials, who want to balance budgets and see their planning
efforts amount to something.
- Institutionssuch as churches, hospitals, arts organizations,
banks, utilitieswho are struggling to maintain investments in
the urban core.
- Historic preservationists, who see sprawl wiping out historic neighborhoods
and rural landscapes.
Across the country, groups like the ones listed
above are coming together in new, smart growth coalitions to fight for
the character of their communities. The movement crosses partisan lines
and is a growing political force.
Back
to top
EcoCity Cleveland 3500 Lorain Avenue, Suite 301, Cleveland OH 44113 Cuyahoga Bioregion
(216) 961-5020 www.ecocitycleveland.org Copyright 2002-2003
|
|
Back to main Smart Growth Agenda
Concerns over urban sprawl seem to be on everyone's agenda
these days. The fact remains that sprawl will continue unabated until
alternatives exist, such as re-using abandoned areas of the inner city.
In the long run, development in urban areas is cheaper (most of the infrastructure
is already in place), more accessible to workers, and more strategically
located for the efficient transportation of goods. In the short term,
financial help is needed to assemble and remediate developable parcels
and, in turn, sell them at a cost which is competitive with greenfield
sites.
from "An Economic Development Agenda for Ohio's Next Governor"
by the Greater Cleveland Growth Association, January 1998
|
|